Mamula v. United Steelworkers of Am., 379 U.S. 17 (1964)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Mamula v. United Steelworkers of Am., 379 U.S. 17 (1964)
Full caption
MAMULA v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA et al .
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Oct. 19, 1964
Opinion
Per curiam
MAMULA v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA et al .
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 327. Decided October 19, 1964.
Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 414 Pa. 294, 200 A. 2d 306.
Harry Alan Sherman for appellant.
David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker, Michael H. Gottesman and Ernest G. Nassar for appellees.
Per Curiam .
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr . Justi ce Brennan is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed, but that in treating the papers as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari should be granted.
Mr . Justi ce Goldb erg took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access