Mamula v. United Steelworkers of Am., 379 U.S. 17 (1964)
Case details
Bluebook Citation
Mamula v. United Steelworkers of Am., 379 U.S. 17 (1964)
Full caption
Nicholas MAMULA v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA et al.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Oct. 19, 1964
Opinion
Per curiam
Nicholas MAMULA v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA et al.
No. 327.
Supreme Court of the United States
October 19, 1964
Harry Alan Sherman, for appellant.
David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker, Michael H. Gottesman and Ernest G. Nassar, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
1
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
2
Mr. Justice BRENNAN is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed, but that, in treating the papers as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari should be granted.
3
Mr. Justice GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this appeal.
CC∅ | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org