Corbin v. Blankenburg, 999 F.2d 1043 (6th Cir. 1993)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Corbin v. Blankenburg, 999 F.2d 1043 (6th Cir. 1993)
Full caption
Gary CORBIN, in his capacity as a Trustee and Fiduciary of the Pattern & Model Makers Association of Warren & Vicinity Pension Fund, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Karl BLANKENBURG; John Cruz; Charles Furlotte; Robert Kuschel; Joseph Laughhunn; Robert Joe Ledbetter; David Margolis; David McEachin; Robert Stephens; Jerome Wilson; Robert Udell; Mid-Continental Claim Service and Administrators, Inc.; Gary Novara; Laurence Breskin, Defendants-Appellees.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
6th Cir.
Decided
Oct. 4, 1993
Disposition
Rehearing En Banc Granted
No. 92-1540.
Oct. 4, 1993.
Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; KEITH, KENNEDY, BOYCE F. MARTIN, NATHANIEL R. JONES, MILBURN, RALPH B. GUY, DAVID A. NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS, ALAN E. NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this ease en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this ease for oral argument as soon as possible.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access