Paleno v. County of Lake, 469 U.S. 1104

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Paleno v. County of Lake, 469 U.S. 1104
Full caption
Paleno et vir v. County of Lake et al.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Disposition
Motion Denied
Dissent
Brennan (Justice) with Marshall (Justice)
No. 84-5706.
Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Motion of appellants for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Appellants are allowed until January 28, 1985, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 45(a) and to submit a statement as to jurisdiction in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall, dissenting.
For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction and, treating the papers whereon the appeal would be taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, we would deny certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access