Yniguez v. Arizonans for Off. Eng., 118 F.3d 667 (9th Cir. 1997)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Yniguez v. Arizonans for Off. Eng., 118 F.3d 667 (9th Cir. 1997)
Full caption
Maria-Kelley F. YNIGUEZ; Jaime P. Gutierrez, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Arizonans Against Constitutional Tampering, Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees, and State of Arizona; Rose Mofford; Robert Corbin, et al., Defendants-Appellees, v. ARIZONANS FOR OFFICIAL ENGLISH; Robert D. Parks, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants. Maria-Kelley F. YNIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF ARIZONA; Rose Mofford; Robert Corbin, et al., Defendants-Appellees, and Arizonans for Official English; Robert D. Parks, Intervenors-Defendants-Appellants. Maria-Kelley F. YNIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STATE OF ARIZONA; Rose Mofford; Robert Corbin, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
July 1, 1997
Disposition
Vacated and Remanded
Nos. 92-17087, 93-15061 and 93-15719.
July 1, 1997.
Before HUG, Chief Judge, and WALLACE, PREGERSON, REINHARDT, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
The judgment of the en banc court, 69 F.3d 920 (9th Cir. 1995), is vacated and the case is remanded to the original three-judge panel with instructions to remand to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona, — U.S.-, 117 S.Ct. 1055, 137 L.Ed.2d 170 (1997).
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access