Agric. Co. v. Pierce County, 73 U.S. (6 Wall.) 246

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Agric. Co. v. Pierce County, 73 U.S. (6 Wall.) 246
Full caption
Agricultural Company v. Pierce County.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Agricultural Company v. Pierce County.
A writ of error made returnable to a day different from the return day fixed by statute as the day on which the term commences, dismissed.
Error to the Supreme Court of Washington Territory.
The writ of error bore date January 20th, 1862. It was on its face made returnable on the second Monday of December next after its date, when it should have been the first Monday of that month, which is by law the day on which the terms of this court commence each year.
For this cause (Mr. Justice MILLER, announcing the order), the writ of error was dismissed under the authority of the cases of Carroll v. Dorsey,X Insurance Company v. Jfordecai,§ and Porter v. Foley,\\ heretofore decided by this court.
Messrs. Lander and Carlisle, for the plaintiff in error; no opposite counsel appearing nor having entered their appearance o record.
f Davenport v. Fletcher, 16 Id. 142.
g 21 Id. 195. || Id- 393<
Dec. 1867.] The Mayor v. Cooper. ^7
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access