Atl. City Elec. Co. v. United States, 400 U.S. 73 (1970)

Case details
Citation
400 U.S. 73
Full caption
ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Dec. 8, 1970
Opinion
Per curiam
ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
No. 78. Argued November 12, 1970—Decided December 8, 1970* No. 78, 306 F. Supp. 338, and No. 106, 316 F. Supp. 337, affirmed by an equally divided Court.
James OMalley, Jr., argued the cause for appellants in No. 78. With him on the briefs were Louis J. Lejkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Walter J. Myskowski, Sheila H. Marshall, and Alfred E. Froh. Charles J. McCarthy argued the cause for appellants in No. 106. With him on the briefs were Arthur L. Winn, Jr., J. Raymond Clark, and Richard J. Hardy.
Deputy Solicitor General Springer argued the cause for the United States et al. in both cases. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Edward M. Shulman, William A. Imhof, Robert W. Ginnane, and Arthur J. Cerra. Hugh B. Cox argued the cause for appellees Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. et al. in both cases. With him on the brief were William H. Allen and Michael Boudin.
John F. Donelan and John M. Cleary filed a brief in No. 106 for the National Industrial Trahie League as amicus curiae urging reversai.
Per Curiam.
The judgments are affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the considération or decision of these cases.
*
Together with No. 106, Alabama Power Co. et al. v. United States et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access