Piccioli v. United States, 390 U.S. 202 (1968)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Piccioli v. United States, 390 U.S. 202 (1968)
Full caption
PICCIOLI v. UNITED STATES.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Mar. 4, 1968
Opinion
Per curiam
PICCIOLI v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 4. Decided March 4, 1968* Certiorari granted; No. 4, 352 F. 2d 856; No. 5, 354 F. 2d 224;
Alfred Belinkie for petitioner in No. 4. Edward G. Burstein for petitioner in No. 5. David Goldstein and Jacob D. Zeldes for petitioner in No. 6. Francis J. DiMento, Paul J. Bums and Ronald R. Popeo for petitioners in No. 10. Albert J. Krieger and Robert Kasanof for petitioners in No. 32. Max M. Barr for petitioner in No. 374.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States in No. 4 and No. 2, Mise. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States in Nos. 5, 6 and
10. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Miss Rosenberg for the United States in No. 32. Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Miss Rosenberg and Jerome M. Feit for the United States in No. 374.
Per Curiam.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted, the judgments of the courts below are vacated, and the cases
*Together with No. 5, Millo v. United States; No. 6, Grassia v. United States; No. 10, Driscoll et al. v. United States; No. 32, Serao et al. v. United States; No. 374, Wrieole v. United States; and No. 2, Mise., Gjanci v. United States, all on petitions for writs of certiorari. Nos. 5, 6, 32, and 2, Mise., are to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 374 to the Third Circuit, and No. 10 to the First Circuit. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in No. 2, Mise., is also granted.
are remanded for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, ante, p. 39.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideraation or decision of these cases.
FORGETT v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.
No. 861, October Term, 1965. Decided March 4, 1968.
Rehearing granted and denial of certiorari, 383 U. S. 926, vacated.
Certiorari granted; 349 F. 2d 601, vacated and remanded.
Charles J. Irwin, Eugene Gressman and Arthur L. Abrams on the petition for rehearing.
Per Curiam.
The petition for rehearing is granted, the order of February 28, 1966, denying certiorari is vacated, the petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is granted, the judgment of that court is vacated, and the case remanded for further consideration in the light of Haynes v. United States, ante, p. 85.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access