Harmar Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, 239 F.2d 555 (2d Cir. 1956)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Harmar Drive-In Theatre, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, 239 F.2d 555 (2d Cir. 1956)
Full caption
HARMAR DRIVE-IN THEATRE, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WARNER BROS. PICTURES, Inc. (In Dissolution), et al., Defendants, and Paramount Film Distributing Corporation, Paramount Pictures, Inc. (In Dissolution), Paramount Pictures Corporation, American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., Loew's Incorporated, Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation (Delaware), RKO Radio Pictures, Inc., RKO Pictures Corporation, United Artists Corporation, Universal Pictures Company, Inc., and Universal Film Exchange, Inc., Defendants-Appellants; COLONIAL DRIVE-IN THEATRE, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WARNER BROS. PICTURES, Inc. (In Dissolution), et al., Defendants, and Paramount Film Distributing Corporation, Paramount Pictures, Inc. (In Dissolution), Paramount Pictures Corporation, American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., Loew's Incorporated, Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation (Delaware), RKO Radio Pictures, Inc., RKO Pictures Corporation, United Artists Corporation, Universal Pictures Company, Inc., and Universal Film Exchange, Inc., Defendants-Appellants
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided
Dec. 28, 1956
The opinion is being processed and will appear here shortly.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access