Wyman v. Bowens, 397 U.S. 49 (1970)

Case details
Citation
397 U.S. 49
Full caption
WYMAN, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEW YORK v. BOWENS et al .
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Feb. 24, 1970
Opinion
Per curiam
WYMAN, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEW YORK v. BOWENS et al .
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT AND SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
No. 866. Decided February 24, 1970*
304 F. Supp. 717, affirmed.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Maria L. Marcus, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant in No. 866. Leonard C. Koldin for appellant in No. 874.
Sydney M. Spector and Richard A. Ellison for appellees in both cases.
Per Curiam .
The motion of the appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed. Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U. S. 618 (1969).
The Chief Justic e , Mr . Justi ce Black , and Mr . Jus - tice Harlan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the cases set for oral argument.
*Together with No. 874, Lascaris, Commissioner of Onondaga County Department of Social Services v. Bowens et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access