Case details
Citation
388 U.S. 439
Full caption
TANNENBAUM v. NEW YORK.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 12, 1967
Opinion
Per curiam
TANNENBAUM v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 993. Decided June 12, 1967.
18 N. Y. 2d 268, 220 N. E. 2d 783, appeal dismissed.
Osmond K. Fraenkel and Stanley Fleishman for appellant.
Frank S. Hogan for appellee.
Horace S. Manges for the American Book Publishers Council, Inc., as amicus curiae, in support of appellant.
Per Curiam .
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed as moot.
Mr . Just ice Brennan would reverse the judgment of the lower court.
Mr . Chief Just ice Warre n , dissenting.
I dissent from the dismissal of this appeal as moot for the reasons stated in my dissent in Jacobs n . New York, ante, p. 431. In my view, the question presented by this case is extremely important and requires a decision on the merits by this Court. I would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for argument.
Mr . Justice Douglas dissents. (See dissent set forth in Jacobs v. New York, ante, at 436.)
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access