Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Comm. on Discipline of the Ass'n of the Bar of the City of N.Y., 386 U.S. 17 (1967)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Kaye v. Co-Ordinating Comm. on Discipline of the Ass'n of the Bar of the City of N.Y., 386 U.S. 17 (1967)
Full caption
KAYE v. CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE ON DISCIPLINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Feb. 13, 1967
Opinion
Per curiam
KAYE v. CO-ORDINATING COMMITTEE ON DIS-
CIPLINE OF THE ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT.
No. 300. Decided February 13, 1967.
Certiorari granted; 24 App. Div. 2d 345, 266 N. Y. S. 2d 69, vacated
and remanded.
Morton Liftin for petitioner.
Angelo T. Cometa for respondent.
Per Curiam .
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, for reconsideration in light of Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S. 511.
Mr . Justi ce Clark , Mr . Justice Harlan , and Mr . Justice Stewar t would affirm the judgment below for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinions of Mr . Justice Harlan in Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 520, and Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U. S. 493, 500.
Mr . Just ice White dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Garrity v. New Jersey, and Spevack v. Klein, 385 U. S., at 530.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access