Bhd. of Ry. & S.S. Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Emps. v. United Air Lines, Inc., 379 U.S. 26 (1964)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Bhd. of Ry. & S.S. Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Emps. v. United Air Lines, Inc., 379 U.S. 26 (1964)
Full caption
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY & STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS & STATION EMPLOYES v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Nov. 9, 1964
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY & STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS & STATION EMPLOYES v. UNITED AIR LINES, INC.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
No. 31. Argued October 22, 1964.—Decided November 9, 1964.
Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted. Reported below: 325 F. 2d 576.
James L. Highsaw, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Edward J. Hickey, Jr.
Stuart Bernstein argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were H. Templeton Brown and Robert L. Stern.
Solicitor General Cox, by special leave of Court, argued the cause for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging reversal. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan S. Rosenthal.
Per Curia m .
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Mr . Justi ce Harlan , believing that the questions which brought this case here should be decided, dissents from the dismissal of the writ.
Mr . Justice Goldb erg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access