Ferguson v. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. Co., 356 U.S. 41 (1958)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Ferguson v. St. Louis-S.F. Ry. Co., 356 U.S. 41 (1958)
Full caption
FERGUSON v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY CO.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Mar. 17, 1958
Opinion
Per curiam
Dissent
Whittaker (J.)
FERGUSON v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY CO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 799. Decided March 17, 1958.
In this case arising under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, held: The proofs were sufficient to submit to the jury the question whether employer negligence played a part in producing petitioner’s injury. Therefore, certiorari is granted, the judgment below is reversed, and the case is remanded for further proceedings. Reported below: 307 S. W. 2d 385.
JoB. Gardner for petitioner.
James L. Homire and Frank C. Mann for respondent.
Per Curiam.
458778 0—58-----7
Per Curiam. 356 U.S.
reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings in conformity with this opinion.
Mr. Justice Harlan concurs in the result for the reasons given in his memorandum in Gibson v. Thompson, 355 U. S. 18.
For the reasons set forth in his opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pacific R. Co., 352 U. S. 500, 524, Mr. Justice Frankfurter is of the view that the writ of certiorari is improvidently granted.
Mr. Justice Whittaker dissents.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access