No. 860. Ill. Com. Commis sion v. cago, 324 U.S. 824 (1945)
324 U.S. 824
US-DOC-27829254
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
No. 860. Ill. Com. Commis sion v. cago, 324 U.S. 824 (1945)
Full caption
No. 860. Illinois Commerce Commis sion v . Chi - cago , Burling ton & Quincy Railroad Co . ;
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Feb. 26, 1945
No. 860. Illinois Commerce Commis sion v . Chi - cago , Burling ton & Quincy Railroad Co . ;
No. 861. Illi nois Commerce Comm is si on v . Scan - drett et al ., Trustees ; and
No. 862. Illinois Commer ce Comm iss ion v . Sprag ue et al ., Recei vers . Appeals from the Supreme Court of Illinois. February 26,1945. Per Curiam: The appeals are dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the court below in each case is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. George F. Barrett, Attorney General, and William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant. Messrs. M. L. Bell, W. F. Peter, Harry E. Boe and Martin L. Cassell, Jr. for appellees in No. 859. Mr. Eldon Martin for appellee in No. 860. Mr. Carson L. Taylor for appellees in No. 861. Mr. Ralph R. Bradley for appellees in No. 862. Reported below: 388 Ill. 138, 57 N. E. 2d 384.
No. 913. Adiron dack Transi t Lines , Inc . v. United State s et al . Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. February 26, 1945. Per Curiam: The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Mr. Martin J. Kelly, Jr. for appellant. Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States et al.; Messrs. John E. Buck and John F. Finerty for the Hudson & Manhattan R. Co.; and Mr. Henry P. Goldstein for the Manhattan Coach Line, Inc. et al., appellees. Reported below: 59 F. Supp. 503.
No. 727. Oriol o v . United States . On petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. February 26,1945. Per Curiam: The petition for writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Mortensen v. United States, 322 U. S. 369. The p. 825Chief Just ice , Mr . Justice Douglas , and Mr . Justi ce Jacks on think that the judgment should be affirmed, the Mortensen case being inapplicable for the reasons stated in the opinion of the court below. Mr. Thomas D. Mc-Bride for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl and Irving S. Shapiro for the United States. Reported below: 146 F. 2d 152.
No. —. Ex parte Howa rd 0. Butle r . February 26, 1945. The motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
No. —. Ex parte Arthu r Lew is . February 26,1945. Application denied.
No. —. Ex part e George S. Mill er ;
No. —. Ex parte George Albert Brown ;
No.—. Ex par te Bryan Schwab ; and
No. —. Illinois ex rel . Rensi ng v . Niers theim er , Warden . February 26, 1945. The motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied.
No. —. Broth erho od & Union of Transit Em - ploy ees of Baltimore v . Madden , Regional Direc tor . February 26, 1945. The motion for a stay is denied.
No. 410. Pric e , Truste e , et al . v . Gurney et al . February 26, 1945. Order entered amending opinion. The petition for rehearing is denied.