No. 746. Superior Confection Co . v. Craig, 279 U.S. 862 (1929)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
No. 746. Superior Confection Co . v. Craig, 279 U.S. 862 (1929)
Full caption
No. 746. Superior Confection Co . v . Craig et al .; and
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 20, 1929
No. 746. Superior Confection Co . v . Craig et al .; and
No. 747. Kiser v . Heise et al . See ante, p. 824.
No. 743. S. S. White Dental Manufacturi ng Co . v . United States . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims denied. Mr. John F. Mc-Carron for petitioner. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Galloway, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and Charles R. Pollard for the United States.
No. 803. A. H. Bull Steams hip Co . v . Hudson et al . ; and
No. 892. Hudson et al . v . Bull Steamshi p Co . May 20, 1929. Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied. Messrs. John W. Crandall, George Whitefield Betts, Jr., and Joseph W. Henderson for A. H. Bull Steamship Company. Mr. H. Alan Dawson for Hudson et al.
No. 811. Trent Trus t Co . v . Isenberg , et al . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Messrs. Oscar Lawler and Alfred Sutro for petitioner. Messrs. John Francis Neylari and Grove J. Fink for respondents.
No. 814. Oregon Exploration Co . v . Reeves et al . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Oregon denied. Messrs. M. D. Leehey and Samuel Herrick for petitioner. Mr. A. E. Reames for respondents.
No. 816. Macondray & Co. v. W. R. Grace & Co. May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Mr. Louis T. Hengstler for petitioner. Mr. W. H. Orrick for respondent.
No. 820. Austi n -Bagle y Corpor atio n et al . v . Unit ed States ; and
No. 831. Fingerhoo d v . Same . May 20, 1929. Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. Lewis Landes tor Austin-Bagley Corporation et al. Mr. Louis Marshall for Fingerhood. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and John J. Byrne for the United States.
No. 822. Urias v . Texas . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the County Court of El Paso County, State of Texas, denied. Mr. Edward D. Tittman for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
No. 823. Day v . United States . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Mr. Will Steel for petitioner. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat, Gardner P. Lloyd, and Barham R. Gary for the United States.
No. 824. Rivers ide Manuf actur ing Co . v . Unite d States . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims denied. *Messrs. James Craig p. 864Peacock and John W. Townsend for petitioner. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Galloway, and Mr. Frank K. Dyar* for the United States.
No. 825. Ander son , etc . v . Shipowne rs ' Associ ation of the Pacific Coast et al . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Mr. H. W. Hutton for petitioner. Messrs. Herman Phleger and Maurice E. Harrison for respondents.
No. 827. Kehota Mining Co . v . Heiner , Coll ecto r of Internal Revenue ; and
No. 828. Same v . Lewellyn , formerly Collector of Internal Revenue . May 20, 1929. Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied. Messrs. Edwin W. Smith, Wm. A. Seifert, and Maynard Teall for petitioner. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Mr. Alfred A. Wheat for respondents.
No. 829. Pere Marquet te R. Co . v . Russell . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Michigan denied. Messrs. John C. Shields, George W. Weadock, John Vincent Weadock, Jerome Weadock, and Arthur Weadock for petitioner. Mr. Miles J. Purcell for respondent.
No. 830. Ellerd v . Grif fi th et al . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Mr. Reuben M. Ellerd, pro se. No appearance for respondents.
No. 832. Ameri can Surety Co . v . Bower s , Coll ecto r of Internal Revenue . May 20,1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. Leo Oppenheimer for petitioner. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and Morton P. Fisher for respondent.
No. 833. Picard et al . v . S. S. “ Calen doni er ,” et al .; and
No. 834. Jonas & Naumburg , Inc . v . Same . May 20, 1929. Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. Theodore L. Bailey for petitioners. Mr. Homer L. Loomis for respondents.
No. 836. O’Neill v . Gray , Administratr ix . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Messrs. Charles D. Lewis and Thomas J. O’Neill for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
No. 837. Hass v . United States . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Mr. Frank J. Hennessy for petitioner. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Luhring, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and Harry 8. Ridgely for the United States.
No. 838. Graffenreid v . Yount -Lee Oil Co. et al . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Mr. R. H. Ward for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
45228°—29-------55
Decisions Denying Certiorari. 279 U.S.
No. 840. Estate of Billw ille r v . Commi ss ioner of Internal Revenue . May 20/ 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Messrs. Henry J. Richardson and L. L. Hamby for petitioner. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and John Vaughan Groner for respondent.
No. 842. Hudso n , Adminis tratr ix , v . Norfolk & West ern R. Co . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied. Mr. Randolph C. Bias for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
No. 844. Tillits on v . Smith , Attorn ey General of Kansas . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Mr. Hal M. Black for petitioner. Messrs. Wm. A. ¡Smith and Roland Boynton for respondent.
No. 848. Ameri can Glycer in Co . v . Burles on et al . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Mr. Harry Tom King for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
- No. 852. Gibs on v . Unite d States ; and No. 859. Brower et al . v . Same . May 20,1929. Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Messrs. Nelson T. Hartson, Edmund L. Jones, and Maurice A. Langhorne for Gibson. Mr. Rufus W. Pearson for Brower et al. p. 867Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General WUlebrandt, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and Barham R. Gary for the United States.
No. 871. Virgini a v . Marshall & Illsl ey Bank , Executor . May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia denied. Mr. Henry R. Miller, Jr., for petitioner. Mr. J. Vaughan Gary for respondent.
No. 872. Larkin et al . v . Washi ngton Loan & Trust Co. May 20, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied. Mr. Paul Sleman for petitioners. Messrs. Arthur Peter, John J. Hamilton, Frank S. Bright, and R. Preston Shealey for respondent.
No. 905. Buzyns ki v . Luckenba ch S. S. Co . et al . On petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. May 27, 1929. Per Curiam: The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no basis for certiorari, application for which is therefore also denied. The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the clerk from the special fund in his custody as provided in the order of October 29, 1926. Mr. William E. Price for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
No. 791. Kemp v . City of Seattle . See ante, p. 825.
No. 805. James Clark Dis til ling Co . v . United States . May 27, 1929. Petition, for writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims denied. Mr. Charles Markell for petitioner. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Galloway, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and Frank K. Dyar for the United States.
No. 835. Lolit a Holding Co . v . Aronson & Co. et al . May 27, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Mr. Will R. King for petitioner. Mr. Jefferson P. Chandler for respondents.
No. 853. Smith v . Mutual Life Ins . Co . May 27, 1929. Petition, for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Messrs. Joseph D. Barksdale, Albert H. Van Hook, and Howard B. Warren for petitioner. Messrs. Richard B. Montgomery and Frederick L. Allen for respondent.
No. 855. Morris on et al . v . Regus , Trust ee in Bank - ruptcy . May 27, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Mr. Henry P. Dart, Jr., for petitioners. No appearance for respondent.
No. 856. Independence Indem nity Co. v. Barber , Guardian , et al . May 27, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Mr. E. Ormonde Hunter for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
No. 858. United State s ex rel . Ulrich v . Stims on , Secretar y . May 27, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia p. 869denied. Mr. Joseph Koletsky for petitioner. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Luhring, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and Harry S. Ridgely for respondents.
No. 861. Mc Kenna v . Anderson , Colle ctor . May-27, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. Louis Marshall for petitioner. A ttorney General Mitchell} Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and Andrew D. Sharpe for respondent.
No. 866. Jacobs v . United States . May 27, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Mr. Lewis Landes for petitioner. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Luhring, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and Harry S. Ridgely for the United States.
No. 887. Harlow , Execut or , et al ., v . Cowl es , Ad - minis tratri x . May 27, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia denied. Messrs. John S. Barbour and Leo P. Harlow for petitioners. Messrs. Daniel Thew Wright and Raymond B. Dickey for respondent.
No. 931. Jumer v. Smith et al . See ante, p. 825.
No. 935. Alderma n v . United State s . On petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. June 3, 1929. Per Curiam: The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon p. 870examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no basis for certiorari, application for which is therefore also denied. The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the clerk from the special fund in his custody as provided in the order of October 29, 1926. Mr. H. M. Carr for petitioner. No appearance for the United States.
No. 821. Elsi nore Perfum e Co ., Inc . v . Campb ell , Prohibi tion Adminis trat or , et al . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Messrs. Lewis Landes and Charles Dickerman Williams for petitioner. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General WUlebrandt, and Mr. Alfred A. Wheat for respondent.
No. 860. Max Levy & Co., Inc . v . Kartz . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Court for the First District, State of Illinois, denied. Mr. Joshua R. H. Potts for petitioner. Messrs. Vernon E. West and Ephraim Banning for respondent.
No. 862. Pelic an Bay Lumbe r Co . v . Blair , Commis - si oner of Internal Reve nue . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Mr. T. T. C. Gregory for petitioner. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General JVillebrandt, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and Millar E. McGilchrist for respondent.
No. 864. Parrott et al . v . Commi ssione r of Inter nal Revenue . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit p. 871denied. Mr. F. Eldred Boland for petitioners. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat, John Vaughan Groner, and Clarence M. Charest for respondent.
No. 865. Fahey v . Sapio et al . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Messrs. Frank 8. Anderson and Mart H. Royston for petitioner. Mr. W. T. Armstrong for respondents.
No. 867. Cornis h et al . v . O’Donog hue et al . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied. Messrs. Louis Marshall and Wm. E. Leahy for petitioners. Messrs. Jesse C. Adkins, Frank F. Nesbit, and Lucien H. Mercier for respondents.
No. 868. Russell et al . v . Wall ace et al . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied. Messrs. Louis Marshall and Wm. E. Leahy for petitioners. Messrs. Jesse C. Adkins, Frank F. Nesbit, and Lucien H. Mercier for respondents.
No. 870. Conklin , Zonne , Loomis Co . v . Blai r , Com - miss ione r of Internal Revenue . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Mr. J. B. Faegre for petitioner. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Mr. Alfred A. Wheat for respondent.
No. 876. Harley & Lund Corporat ion v . Murray Rubber Co . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. Edward F. Unger for petitioner. Mr. Robert Kelly Prentice for respondent.
No. 881. Haskell v . Perkins et al .; and
No. 882. Same v . Same . June 3, 1929. Petition for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied. Mr. Robert H. McCarter for petitioner. Messrs. Charles E. Hughes, George W. Schurman, Forrest Hyde, and Philip M. Payne for respondents.
No. 883. White v . United States . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied. Mr. Samuel L. White, pro se. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Luhring, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and Harry S. Ridgely for the United States.
No. 884. Krauss Brothers Lumber Co . v . Mellon , Direc tor General . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Mr. Brenton K. Fisk for petitioner. Messrs. Alexander M. Bull and Sidney F. Andrews for respondent.
No. 888. Neus s , Hess lein & Co., Inc ., v . Edwards , Collector of Internal Revenue . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. Richard S. Holmes for petitioner. *Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant p. 873Attomey General Willebrandt, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat, Randolph C. Shaw, and Clarence M. Charest* for respondent.
No. 898. Farr ingt on et al ., Executor s , v . Commi s - sioner of Internal Revenue . 'June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied. Mr. Marvin Farrington for petitioners. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and Barham R. Gary for respondent.
No. 899. Lisansky et al . v . United States . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Mr. Isaac Lobe Straus for petitioners. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and John Vaughan Groner for respondent.
No. 902. Fireston e Tire & Rubber Co . et al . v . Fay - ette Bank & Trust Co . et al . ;
No. 903. Same v . Same ; and
No. 904. Fayet te Bank & Trust Co. et al . v . Herod et al . June 3, 1929. Petitions for writs of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied. Messrs. Harvey J. Elam, Howard S. Young, and Willis Bacon for Firestone Tire & Rubber Company et al. Messrs. George L. Wire and Solon J. Carter for Fayette Bank & Trust Company et al. Mr. William P. Herod, pro se. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and John Vaughan Groner for Herod et al.
No. 910. Simm s Oil Co . v . Day , Sherif f and ex offi cio Tax Collect or . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Mr. S. L. Herold for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
No. 912. Feeders ’ Supply Co . v . Commi ss ioner of Internal Revenue . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Mr. Theodore B. Benson for petitioner. Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, and Messrs. Alfred A. Wheat and Arthur W. Henderson for respondent.
No. 918. Orient Point Wharf Co. et al . v . Machias Lumber Co . et al . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. E. Curtis Rouse for petitioners. Mr. Edward Ash for respondents.
No. 926. Southern Trus t Co . v , Austin et al . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied. Messrs. Kent V. Gay and William E. Allen for petitioner. Messrs. Stanley Boykin and H. C. Ray for respondents.
No. 929. Saitta v . S. S. “ Florind a ” et al . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Mr. Louis Joffe for petitioner. Mr. L. DeGrove Potter for respondents.
No. 932. Atlantic Gulf and West Indies S. S. Lines v. Interoce an Oil Co . June 3, 1929. Petition for writ p. 875279 U. S. Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court.
of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied. Messrs. Roscoe H. Hupper and Frederic Conger for petitioner. Messrs. Stuart S. Janney and Robert W. Williams for respondent.
CASES DISPOSED OF WITHOUT CONSIDERATION BY THE COURT, FROM FEBRUARY 19, 1929, TO AND INCLUDING JUNE 3, 1929.
No. 617. Porter , Commis sio ner of Finance of the State of Idaho v . United Stat es . On petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. February 25, 1929. Dismissed pursuant to paragraph 2 of rule 13. Messrs. Leslie J. Aker, Frank L. Stephan, and Charles E. Hughes for petitioner. No appearance for the United States.
No. 195. United States v . Perss on . On writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. March 11,1929. Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in the case of McDonald n . United States, ante, p. 12, per stipulation of counsel, on motion of Mr. Alfred A. Wheat in that behalf. Messrs. J. Harry Covington and Dean Acheson for respondent.
No. 196. United States v . Nicol ich . On writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. March 11,1929. Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court in the case
Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court. 279 U. S.
of McDonald v. United States, ante, p. 12, per stipulation of counsel, on motion of Mr. Alfred A. Wheat in that behalf. Messrs. J. Harry Covington, Dean Acheson and Walker B. Spencer for respondent.
No. 407. Commi ssione r of Internal Revenue v . Old Colony Railroad . On writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. April 15, 1929. Dismissed with costs, on motion of Mr. Alfred A. Wheat for petitioner. Messrs. James S. Y. Ivins and Kingman Brewster for respondent.
No. 795. Hardw ick Realty Co., Inc. v. Comm is si oner of Internal Revenue . On petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. April 15, 1929. Dismissed on motion of Messrs. Brison Howie and Frank S. Bright for petitioner.
No. 148. Magnolia Gas Co . v . Leep er , Secret ary of State . Error to and appeal from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma. April 15, 1929. Dismissed with costs, per stipulation of counsel. Messrs. B. B. Blakeney and W. H. Francis for plaintiff in error and appellant. Mr. Edward Dabney, Attorney General of Oklahoma, for defendant in error and appellee.
No. 839. Adler v . Rector , Sherif f , et al . Appeal from the Supreme Court of South Carolina. May 20, 1929. Dismissed with costs, pursuant to paragraph 4 of rule 12. Mr. Sam J. Nicholls for appellant. No appearance for appellees.
279 U. S. Cases Disposed of Without Consideration by the Court.
No. 904. Fayet te Bank & Trust Co . et al . v . Herod et al , May 27, 1929. Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed as to Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York, a respondent, on motion of Mr. George L. Wire for petitioners.
No. 913. Unite d Stat es v . Skinne r . Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida. June 3, 1929. Dismissed on motion of Attorney General Mitchell for the United States.
(no text on this page in the source reporter)
Summ ary Stat em ent of Busin ess of the Supre me Court of the Unite d Stat es for Oct obe r Ter m , 1928.
Original Docket
Cases pending at beginning of term..................................................... 15
New cases docketed during term............................................................ 6
Cases finally disposed of........................................................................ 3
Cases not finally disposed of.................................................................. 18
Appellate Docket
Cases pending at beginning of term..................................................... 175
New cases docketed during term.............................................................. 772
Cases finally disposed of.......................................................................... 822
Cases not finally disposed of.................................................................. 125
The number of pending cases, original and appellate, was thus decreased by 47.
Interlocutory decisions, and adverse decisions upon applications for leave to file, as in mandamus, prohibition, etc., are not here included.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access