Armstrong v. United States, 182 U.S. 243 (1901)

Case details
Citation
182 U.S. 243
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 27, 1901
ARMSTRONG u UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS.
No. 509. Argued January 8, 9,10 and 11,1901.—Decided May 27,1901.
Dooley v. United States, ante, 222, followed.
Thi s was a petition to the Court of Claims by a British subject, to recover duties exacted by the collector of the port of San Juan, and paid under protest, upon goods, wares, and merchandise of the growth, produce, or manufacture of the United States, between August 12, 1898, and December 5, 1899.
The same demurrer was filed and the same judgment was entered as in the preceding case.
Jfk Alphonse Hart and JZr. John G. Carlisle for appellant.
ohn C. Chaney and Ur. Charles C. Leeds were on Ur. aart's brief.
r. Solicitor General and Ur. Attorney General for appellee.
Me . Just ic e Bro wn delivered the opinion of the court.
This case is controlled by the case of Dooley n . United States, No. 501, just decided. So far as the duties were exacted upon goods imported prior to the ratification of the treaty of April 11, 1899, they were properly exacted. So far as they were imposed upon importations after that date and prior to December 5,1899, plaintiff is entitled to recover them back.
The judgment of the Court of Claims is therefore reversed and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access