Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Ent. Distrib., 34 F. App'x 312 (9th Cir. 2002)
34 F. App'x 312
US-DOC-26592401
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Ent. Distrib., 34 F. App'x 312 (9th Cir. 2002)
Full caption
TWENTIETH CENTURY FOX FILM CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; SFM Entertainment LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; New Line Home Video Inc., a New York Corporation, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees, v. ENTERTAINMENT DISTRIBUTING, an Oregon Corporation; Marathon Music & Video, an Oregon Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, Dastar Corporation, an Oregon Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Apellant, Random House, Inc., Counter-Defendant-Appellee; Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; SFM Entertainment LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; New Line Home Video Inc., a New York Corporation, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees, v. Entertainment Distributing, an Oregon Corporation; Marathon Music & Video, an Oregon Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, Dastar Corporation, an Oregon Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, Random House, Inc., Counter-Defendant-Appellee; Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; SFM Entertainment LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; New Line Home Video Inc., a New York Corporation, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellees, v. Entertainment Distributing, an Oregon Corporation; Marathon Music & Video, an Oregon Corporation, Defendants-Appellants, Dastar Corporation, an Oregon Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, Random House, Inc., sued as Doubleday, a division of Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc., Counter-Defendant-Appellee
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
Apr. 19, 2002
The opinion is being processed and will appear here shortly.