Shockey v. Illinois, 375 U.S. 22 (1963)

375 U.S. 22
84 S. Ct. 83
11 L. Ed. 2d 43
1963 SCDB 7
1963 U.S. LEXIS 531
US-DOC-26523363
locator
Case details
Citation
375 U.S. 22
Full caption
SHOCKEY v. ILLINOIS.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Oct. 14, 1963
Opinion
Per curiam
p. 22
SHOCKEY v. ILLINOIS.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 20, Mise. Decided October 14, 1963.
Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. Reported below: 25 Ill. 2d 528, 185 N. E. 2d 893.
John R. Snively for petitioner.
William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.
Per Curiam .
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Illinois for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.
Mr . Justi ce Harlan , for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access