City of New York v. United States, 397 U.S. 248 (1970)

397 U.S. 248
90 S. Ct. 1105
25 L. Ed. 2d 280
US-DOC-25129776
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
City of New York v. United States, 397 U.S. 248 (1970)
Full caption
CITY OF NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES et al.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Mar. 16, 1970
Opinion
Per curiam
CITY OF NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 1121.
Marshall B. GROSSMAN et al.
v.
AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.
No. 1122.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 16, 1970
J. Lee Rankin, Norman Redlich, John R. Thompson, and David I. Shapiro, for appellant City of New York.
Benjamin F. Schwartz and Herbert A. Karzen, for appellants Marshall B. Grossman and others.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, and Bernard M. Hollander, for the United States.
Carl J. Schuck, Wayne H. Knight, Fred D. Fagg III, Philip K. Verleger, Allyn O. Kreps, Julian O. Von Kalinowski, Lloyd N. Cutler, Howard P. Willens, James S. Campbell, Ross L. Malone, and Marcus Mattson, for appellees Automobile Manufacturers Ass'n, Inc., and others.
Jerry S. Cohen, Harold E. Kohn, Aaron M. Fine, and William T. Coleman, Jr., for City of Baltimore and others, amici curiae.
John H. Larson, for County of Los Angeles and others, amicus curiae.
David Berger and Herbert B. Newberg, for County of Lackawanna and others, amici curiae.
PER CURIAM.
1
In No. 1121 the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
2
In No. 1122 the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
CC∅ | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access