Holden v. Arnebergh, 394 U.S. 102 (1969)

394 U.S. 102
89 S. Ct. 926
22 L. Ed. 2d 112
US-DOC-25129544
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
Holden v. Arnebergh, 394 U.S. 102 (1969)
Full caption
Eugene HOLDEN et al. v. Roger ARNEBERGH, City Attorney, Los Angeles, et al.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Mar. 3, 1969
Opinion
Per curiam
p. 102
394 U.S. 102
89 S.Ct. 926
22 L.Ed.2d 112
Eugene HOLDEN et al. v. Roger ARNEBERGH, City Attorney, Los Angeles, et al.
No. 945.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 3, 1969
Burton Marks, for appellants.
Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Robert B. Burns, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
1
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed, it appearing that the judgment below rests upon an adequate state ground.
CC∅ | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access