Miller v. California, 389 U.S. 968 (1967)

389 U.S. 968
88 S. Ct. 460
19 L. Ed. 2d 459
US-DOC-25129254
locator
Case details
Citation
389 U.S. 968
Full caption
Lucille MILLER, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Dec. 4, 1967
Lucille MILLER, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.
No. 154.
Supreme Court of the United States
December 4, 1967
F. Lee Bailey and Alan M. Dershowitz, for petitioner.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Philip C. Griffin, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
1
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, granted limited to questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:
2
'1. Whether the introduction of admissions made to an undercover agent planted in petitioner's jail cell constituted a violation of petitioner's constitutional rights to counsel and against self-incrimination.
3
'2. Whether inculpatory admissions, obtained under circumstances like those here involved, can ever constitute harmless error.'
4
The case is placed on the summary calendar.
CC∅ | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access