Worthy v. United States, 384 U.S. 894 (1966)

384 U.S. 894
86 S. Ct. 1961
16 L. Ed. 2d 1000
US-DOC-25128920
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
Worthy v. United States, 384 U.S. 894 (1966)
Full caption
Jerome WORTHY v. UNITED STATES.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
June 20, 1966
Opinion
Per curiam
Jerome WORTHY v. UNITED STATES.
No. 1107, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States
June 20, 1966
David B. Isbell, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson, for the United States.
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
PER CURIAM.
1
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Dennis v. United States, 384 U.S. 855, 86 S.Ct. 1840, 16 L.Ed.2d 973.
CC∅ | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access