City of Los Angeles v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 359 U.S. 119 (1959)

359 U.S. 119
79 S. Ct. 722
3 L. Ed. 2d 674
US-DOC-25127386
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
City of Los Angeles v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 359 U.S. 119 (1959)
Full caption
CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., appellants, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA et al.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Mar. 23, 1959
Opinion
Per curiam
CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., appellants, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA et al.
No. 656.
Supreme Court of the United States
March 23, 1959
Messrs. Roger Arnebergh, Alan G. Campbell and Walhfred Jacobson, for appellants.
Mr. J. Thomason Phelps, for appellees.
Messrs. Arthur T. George, Francis N. Marshall, John Robert Jones, Alvin H. Pelavin and Warren A. Palmer, for appellees Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. and others.
Messrs. John C. Banks, Walter J. Mattison, John C. Melaniphy, J. Elliott Drinard, Claude V. Jones, Charles S. Rhyne and J. Parker Connor, for Member Municipalities of the National Institute of Municipal Law Officers, as amici curiae.
Messrs. Archie L. Walters, M. Tellefson, John H. Lauten, Henry McClernan and Everett M. Glenn, for the Cities of Azusa and others, as amici curiae.
Messrs. A. L. Wirin and Fred Okrand, for American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, as amici curiae.
PER CURIAM.
1
The motion of The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company et al. to be added as parties appellee is granted. The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
2
Mr. Justice BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
CC∅ | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access