Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co. v. Knox, 110 U.S. 304 (1884)

110 U.S. 304
3 S. Ct. 638
28 L. Ed. 155
1884 U.S. LEXIS 1694
1883 SCDB 142
US-DOC-25111371
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co. v. Knox, 110 U.S. 304 (1884)
Full caption
WABASH, ST. L. & P. RY. CO. v. KNOX.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Jan. 28, 1884
Majority
Waite (Chief Judge)
WABASH, ST. L. & P. RY. CO. v. KNOX.
January 28, 1884.
Vespasian Warner, for motion.
H. S. Greene, Wm. Brown, and Edw. P. Kisby, in opposition.
WAITE, C. J.
1
The judgment in this case was for $5,237.15, but the record shows in many ways that of this amount $727.42 was admitted to be due. A formal tender of that sum was made on the twenty-sixth of February, 1883, and the money deposited in court for Knox, the plaintiff, where it remained until the fourteenth of March, nine days after the judgment was rendered, when it was withdrawn by the railroad company, without prejudice, on the order of the court, and with the consent and agreement of Knox. The bill of exceptions also shows an admitted liability of the company for the amount of the tender. The case is, therefore, in all material respects, like that of Tintsman v. Nat. Bank, 100 U. S. 6, where the writ was dismissed, althought the judgment was for $8,233.59, because, by an agreed statement of facts in the record, it appeared that the defendant admitted he owed $5,009.59 of the amount recovered. To the same effect is Jennes v. Citizens' Nat. Bank of Romeo, ante, 425. The amount in dispute here is no more than was in dispute below, and that was less than $5,000.
2
The motion to dismiss is granted.
CC∅ | Transformed by Public.Resource.Org
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access