Pallas v. State, 654 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 1995)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Pallas v. State, 654 So. 2d 127 (Fla. 1995)
Full caption
John PALLAS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Florida (FL)
Court
Florida Supreme Court
Decided
May 4, 1995
Disposition
Accordingly, we approve the decision in Pallas on this issue
John PALLAS, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
May 4, 1995.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Manuel Alvarez, Asst. Public Defender, Miami, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for respondent.
SHAW, Justice.
We have for review Pallas v. State, 636 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), wherein the district court upheld the constitutionality of Florida's anti-stalking statute, section 784.048, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
We have recently upheld the constitutionality of the anti-stalking statute. See Bouters v. State, No. 83,558, ___ So.2d ___ [1995 WL 242403] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly, we approve the decision in Pallas on this issue.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
KOGAN, J., concurs specially with an opinion.
KOGAN, Justice, specially concurring.
With the exception of the reservations that I stated in Bouters v. State, No. 83,558, ___ So.2d ___ [1995 WL 242403] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995), (Kogan, J., specially concurring), I concur with majority.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access