State v. Hoagland, 272 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 1973)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
State v. Hoagland, 272 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 1973)
Full caption
STATE of Florida, Plaintiff, v. Ralph HOAGLAND et al., Defendants.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Florida (FL)
Court
Florida Supreme Court
Decided
Jan. 31, 1973
STATE of Florida, Plaintiff, v. Ralph HOAGLAND et al., Defendants.
Supreme Court of Florida.
January 31, 1973.
Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and A.S. Johnston, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jerry Bross, County Sol., Brevard County, for plaintiff.
Vocelle, Harris & Rieders, Merritt Island, for Ralph Hoagland.
Joseph R. Moss, Asst. Public Defender, for Sandy Brown.
PER CURIAM.
The District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, tranferred to this Court a question of law certified to the District Court by the Court of Record for Brevard County. Rule 4.6, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A., 1962 Revision.
The question, as stated by the Court of Record, is:
"Was the delivery and possession of phencyclidine lawfully prohibited by Sections 404.02(1) and 404.02(5), F.S. [F.S.A.], on September 25, October 1, and December 16, 1971?"
The question was considered fully by this Court and answered in the negative in Freimuth v. State, 272 So. 2d 473, filed December 20, 1972. Accordingly, the question certified by the Court of Record for Brevard County is, and must be answered in the negative.
It is so ordered.
ROBERTS, Acting C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access