Fosdick v. Linzell, 359 U.S. 230 (1959)

Case details
Citation
359 U.S. 230
Full caption
FOSDICK v. LINZELL.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
Apr. 6, 1959
Opinion
Per curiam
FOSDICK v. LINZELL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 704. Decided April 6, 1959. Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.
Robert Fosdick, appellant, pro se. Per Curiam .
The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Mr . Justi ce Stew art took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
BRISTOL et al . v. HEATON et al .
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OF TEXAS,
TENTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT. No. 581, Misc. Decided April 6, 1959. Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. Reported below: 317 S. W. 2d 86.
Appellants pro se.
Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, James N. Ludlum, First Assistant Attorney General, and Leonard Passmore and John Reeves, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
Per Curiam .
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for certiorari, certiorari is denied.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access