Jones v. City of Opelika, 319 U.S. 103 (1943)

Case details
Citation
319 U.S. 103
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided
May 3, 1943
Opinion
Per curiam
Dissent
Reed (Justice)

United States Supreme Court

JONES v. CITY OF OPELIKA (1943)

No. 280

Decided: May 03, 1943

Robert MURDOCK, Jr., Petitioner, v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA (CITY OF JEANNETTE), and seven other cases.
Nos. 280, 314, 966, 480-487.
Supreme Court of the United States
Reargued March 10, 11, 1943
May 3, 1943
Mr. Justice REED, dissenting. p. 104Mr. Hayden C. Covington, of Brooklyn, N.Y., for petitioners.
No appearance for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The judgments in these cases were affirmed at the October Term, 1941. 316 U.S. 584 , 62 S.Ct. 1231, 141 A.L.R. 514. Because the issues in all three cases were of the same character as those brought before us in other cases by applications for certiorari at the present term, we ordered a reargument and heard these cases together with Nos. 480- 487, Murdock et al. v. Pennsylvania. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court in Nos. 480-487, 319 U.S. 105 , 63 S.Ct. 870, 87 L.Ed. --, decided this day, and in the dissenting opinions filed in the present cases after the argument last term, the Court is of opinion that the judgment in each case should be reversed. The judgments of this Court heretofore entered in these cases are therefore vacated, and the judgments of the state courts are reversed. So ordered.
REVERSED.
For dissenting opinions of Mr. Justice REED, and Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, see 319 U.S. 105 , 63 S.Ct. 891.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access