Auchincloss v. Comm'r, 11 B.T.A. 947 (1928)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Auchincloss v. Comm'r, 11 B.T.A. 947 (1928)
Full caption
J. Howland Auchincloss, Executor, Estate of Charles H. Russell, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
B.T.A.
Decided
May 2, 1928
Docket No. 24312. Promulgated May 2, 1928.
Blount Ralls, Esq., for the petitioner.
M. N. Fisher, Esq., for the respondent.
OPINION.
Littleton: It is contended by the petitioner that amounts collected by him as the executor on account of services rendered prior p. 949to the decedent’s death, represented capital in the hands of the estate at decedent’s death, and, therefore, were not taxable income when received by the estate. On the other hand, Commissioner contends that amounts collected constituted taxable income when received by the estate.
The claim of the executor is correct. Nichols v. United States, (Ct. Cls.), 6 Am. Fed. Tax Rep. 6592; Walter R. McCarthy, Executor, 9 B. T. A. 525; George Nichols et al., Executors, 10 B. T. A. 919.
Judgment of no'deficiency will he entered.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access