Peirce v. Reintzel, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) 101 (1814)

19 F. Cas. 122
2 Cranch 101
US-DOC-22913879
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
Peirce v. Reintzel, 6 U.S. (2 Cranch) 101 (1814)
Full caption
PEIRCE v. REINTZEL.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
C.C.D.C.
Decided
1814
Case No. 10,908.
June Term, 1814.
Witness — Interest is Controversy.
The principal obligor, having confessed judgment, and having been released by the defendant from the costs of this suit, is a competent witness for the defendant, to prove the bond usurious.
Debt on the joint and several bond of Daniel and John Reintzel, Daniel, the principal obligor, having confessed judgment, was offered as a witness for the defendant, to prove usury. The plaintiff objected, and cited the case of Virginia v. Evans [Case No. 16,969], in this court at November term, 1809, and Riddle v. Moss, 7 Cranch [11 U. S.] 206. The defendant released to Daniel Reintzei all costs of the present action in case judgment should go against him.
THE COURT (THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, doubting) permitted the principal obligor to-testify for the defendant.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access