Smith v. Clarke, 8 U.S. (4 Cranch) 293 (1833)

22 F. Cas. 488
4 Cranch 293
2 Cranch 237
US-DOC-22912299
locator
Case details
Citation
22 F. Cas. 488
Full caption
SMITH et ux. v. CLARKE.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
C.C.D.C.
Decided
1833
Case No. 13,028.
March Term, 1833.
Pleading at Law — Proof—Variance—Due-Bill Made-to Wife — Before Marriage— During Coverture.
A due-bill made to the wife during the cov-erture, and for a consideration accruing during the coverture, is not admissible evidence to support a declaration which avers that the due-bill was made dnm sola.
The declaration stated that the due-bill, ' which was made to the wife, was made to her dum sola. The due-bill offered in evidence was given to her after the marriage, and during the coverture, for a consideration accruing during the coverture.
The defendant objected to the evidence for the variance, and the objection was sustained by THE COURT. (THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent.)
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access