Mattiza v. Texas, 502 U.S. 937

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Mattiza v. Texas, 502 U.S. 937
Full caption
Mattiza v. Texas.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Disposition
Motion Denied
Dissent
Blackmun (Justice) with Stevens (Justice)
No. 91-5759.
Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until November 25, 1991, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens, dissenting.
For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access