Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493 (9th Cir. 1995)

Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493 (9th Cir. 1995)

Pano CONCHA, M.D. and Marta Concha, as fiduciaries and on behalf of all the participants and beneficiaries of The Pano Concha, M.D., a Professional Corporation Defined Benefit Pension Plan; The Pano Concha, M.D., a Professional Corporation Defined Benefit Plan, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Philip D. LONDON; London & Lichtenberg, an accountancy corporation; Matthew Lichtenberg; London, Caldwell & Lewinson; Alan B. Lewinson; Thomas F. Caldwell, Jr.; London & Lewinson; Caldwell & Lewinson; Michael Weatherford; Southland Pension Services, Inc., William A. Saborsky; Daniel J. Van Mieghem, Integrated Pension Services, Inc.; David L. Brady, a professional corporation; King, Brady & Bazar, a law corporation; Marc Paul Jacobs; Wood, Lucksinger & Epstein; Jerry L. Freeman; King & Brady, a law corporation; and Does 1 through 1000, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees; Pano CONCHA, M.D. and Marta Concha, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Philip D. LONDON; London & Lichtenberg, an accountancy corporation; Matthew Lichtenberg; London, Caldwell & Lewinson; Alan B. Lewinson; Thomas F. Caldwell, Jr.; London & Lewinson; Caldwell & Lewinson; Michael Weatherford; David L. Brady, a professional corporation; King, Brady & Bazar, a law corporation; Marc Paul Jacobs; Wood, Lucksinger & Epstein; Jerry L. Freeman; King & Brady, a law corporation; and Does 1 through 1000, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees

United States

Federal

9th Cir.

Aug. 15, 1995