Locke v. Lee, 227 F. 1019 (8th Cir. 1915)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Locke v. Lee, 227 F. 1019 (8th Cir. 1915)
Full caption
LOCKE v. LEE.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
8th Cir.
Decided
Dec. 8, 1915
December 8, 1915.) No. 4579. In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. Ambrose Tighe and M. W. Knapp, both of St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiff in error. W. S. Laudor, of Wahpeton, N. D., and Durment, Moore, Oppenheimer & Haupt, of St. Paul, Minn., for defendant in error.
PER CURIAM. Dismissed, without costs to either party in this court; mandate to issue forthwith, and attorney fee for defendant in error waived, per stipulation of parties.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access