Schwartz v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 25 A.D.2d 639

25 A.D.2d 639
US-DOC-21361570
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
Schwartz v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 25 A.D.2d 639
Full caption
Milton Schwartz et al. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
New York (NY)
Court
New York Court of Appeals
New York Official Reports
Milton Schwartz et al. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., 25 AD2d 639
[p. 639]
Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs.
Concur — McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.; Rabin, J. P., dissents and votes to grant leave to reargue.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access