People v. Fleming, 70 N.Y.2d 947 (1988)
70 N.Y.2d 947
US-DOC-21338673
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
People v. Fleming, 70 N.Y.2d 947 (1988)
Full caption
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alonzo Fleming, Appellant.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
New York (NY)
Court
N.Y.
Decided
1988
New York Official Reports
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alonzo Fleming, Appellant., 70 NY2d 947 [1988]
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant’s sole claim of error — that the trial court violated his right of confrontation by permitting the arresting officer to testify that he arrested defendant after a conversation with an individual who did not testify — has not been preserved for our review. Although defense counsel sought a prospective ruling on this point, the court declined to make an anticipatory ruling. When the arresting officer later testified at trial, counsel entered objections as "objection” or "leading”, but failed to advise the trial court that the present claimed error was the basis for any of his objections. The word "objection” alone was insufficient to preserve the issue for our review (see, People v Love, 57 NY2d 1023, 1025; People v West, 56 NY2d 662, 663).
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.