Miller v. Schindler’s Prairie House, Inc., 250 N.Y. 574 (1929)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Miller v. Schindler’s Prairie House, Inc., 250 N.Y. 574 (1929)
Full caption
Bernard Miller, as Administrator of the Estate of Harry Miller, Deceased, Respondent, v. Schindler’s Prairie House, Inc., Appellant. Esther Friedman, as Administratrix of the Estate of Mary Friedman, Deceased, Respondent, v. Schindler’s Prairie House, Inc., et al., Appellants.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
New York (NY)
Court
N.Y.
Decided
1929
New York Official Reports
Bernard Miller, as Administrator of the Estate of Harry Miller, Deceased, Respondent, v. Schindler’s Prairie House, Inc., Appellant. Esther Friedman, as Administratrix of the Estate of Mary Friedman, Deceased, Respondent, v. Schindler’s Prairie House, Inc., et al., Appellants., 250 NY 574 [1929]
In each action judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access