Woratzeck v. Ricketts, 859 F.2d 1559 (9th Cir. 1988)
859 F.2d 1559
US-DOC-21139722
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
Woratzeck v. Ricketts, 859 F.2d 1559 (9th Cir. 1988)
Full caption
William Lyle WORATZECK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James R. RICKETTS, and Donald Wawrzaszek, Respondents-Appellees.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
9th Cir.
Decided
Nov. 7, 1988
No. 85-2367.
Nov. 7, 1988.
James J. Syme, Jr., Glendale, Ariz., for petitioner-appellant.
Crane McClennen, Phoenix, Ariz., for respondents-appellees.
Before WALLACE, FARRIS and BOOCHEYER, Circuit Judges.
The Supreme Court, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2815, 100 L.Ed.2d 916, has ordered the judgment vacated and remanded the cause to us “for further consideration in light of Maynard v. Cartwright, 486 U.S. - [108 S.Ct. 1853, 100 L.Ed.2d 372] (1988).” In compliance with the Supreme Court’s mandate, we hereby vacate the district court’s judgment and remand for further consideration in light of Maynard.
The district court is advised that Adamson v. Ricketts, 789 F.2d 722 (9th Cir.1986) (en banc), rev’d, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2680, 97 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987), is pending before this court en banc. That decision, when filed, should also be considered by the district court.