United States v. Kuhn, 638 F.2d 17 (1981)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
United States v. Kuhn, 638 F.2d 17 (1981)
Full caption
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert J. KUHN, Jose C. Davila, and Doyle E. Huckabee, Defendants-Appellants.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Decided
Feb. 23, 1981
No. 80-1207
Summary Calendar.
Feb. 23, 1981.
James Daniel (Jay) Doyle, III, Austin, Tex., for defendant-appellant Davilla.
Albert A. Pena, III, Corpus Christi, Tex., for defendant-appellant Huckabee.
Richard Witte Alexander, Austin, Tex., for defendant-appellant Kuhn.
LeRoy Morgan Jahn, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
Before GEE, RUBIN and RANDALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In our original opinion, we decided the merits of this attempted Abney 1-type appeal on the assumption that we had jurisdiction to do so, expressly reserving that question. Since then it has been determined that we lack such jurisdiction. United States v. Becton, 632 F.2d 1294 (5th Cir. 1980). What we earlier wrote on the merits is therefore of no effect. We withdraw it. The appeal is
DISMISSED.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access