L.A. Newspaper Guild v. Nat'l Lab. Rels. Bd., 443 F.2d 1173 (9th Cir. 1971)
443 F.2d 1173
US-DOC-21119819
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
L.A. Newspaper Guild v. Nat'l Lab. Rels. Bd., 443 F.2d 1173 (9th Cir. 1971)
Full caption
LOS ANGELES NEWSPAPER GUILD, LOCAL 69, et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, and Los Angeles Herald Examiner, Division of the Hearst Corporation, and San Francisco Examiner, Division of the Hearst Corporation, Intervenors.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
9th Cir.
Decided
June 7, 1971
Disposition
Petition for Review Denied
No. 26534.
June 7, 1971.
Stephen Reinhardt (argued), George E. Bodle, Daniel Fogel, Lester G. Ostrov, of Bodle, Fogel, Julber & Reinhardt, Herbert M. Ansell, of Ansell & Ansell, Duane B. Beeson, of Brundage, Neyhart, Grodin & Beeson, Eugene Miller, Paul Crost, of Brundage, Neyhart, Miller, Ross & Reich, Leo Geffner, of Geffner & Satzman, Los Angeles, Cal., Irwin Leff, of Rosenthal & Leff, Duane Bee-son, of Neyhart, Grodin & Beeson, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Baruch A. Fellner (argued), Atty., for NLRB, Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D. C., Richard C. White, Los Angeles, Cal. (argued), for intervenor.
O’Melveny & Myers, Ralph E. Kennedy, Regional Director, Los Angeles, Garret McEnerney, II, R. Barry Churton, of Cooper, White & Cooper, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, ELY and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The petition for review is denied.
The Board’s cross application for enforcement is granted. See the Board’s opinion, reported at 185 NLRB No. 25.