Bruce v. United States, 458 F.2d 511 (4th Cir. 1972)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Bruce v. United States, 458 F.2d 511 (4th Cir. 1972)
Full caption
Wendell Asbury BRUCE, Jr., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
4th Cir.
Decided
May 15, 1972
Disposition
Affirmed
No. 71-1345.
Argued May 9, 1972.
Decided May 15, 1972.
Jack F. McGuinn, Columbia, S. C. (Court-appointed counsel), for appellant.
Robert G. Clawson, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. (John K. Grisso, U. S. Atty., on brief), for appellee.
Before BOREMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and WINTER and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In a previous appeal we remanded this ease to the district court for a full evi-dentiary hearing to determine whether defendant, who was convicted for refusing to report for induction, was ordered to report for induction illegally, in that the order was accelerated by reason of his delinquency. Bruce v. United States, 448 F.2d 21 (4 Cir. 1971). We find no error in the district court’s factual determination that defendant’s induction had not been accelerated.
We find no merit in defendant’s other contentions on which decision was reserved in the prior appeal.
Affirmed.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access