Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc., 283 F.2d 695 (9th Cir. 1960)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc., 283 F.2d 695 (9th Cir. 1960)
Full caption
SARKES TARZIAN, INC., a Corporation, Appellant, v. AUDIO DEVICES, INC., a Corporation, et al., Appellees.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided
Nov. 21, 1960
Disposition
Per Curiam Affirmed
No. 16431.
Nov. 21, 1960.
C. B. Dutton, Carl D. Overman, Indianapolis, Ind., Jacob Swartz, Los Ange-les, Cal. (Dutton & Kappes, Indianapolis, Ind., Dryden, Harrington, Horgan & Swartz, Los Angeles, Cal., Mason, Koleh-mainen Rathburn & Wyss, Chicago, 111., of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
Richards, Watson, Birnbaum & Smith, Clifford A. Hemmerling, Los Angeles, Cal. (Pennie, Edmonds, Morton, Barrows & Taylor, Thomas F. Reddy, Jr., Fritz L. Schweitzer, Jr., James G. Foley, New York City, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.
Before STEPHENS, BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed in the case by the learned District Judge, and reported at D.C., 166 F.Supp. 250.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access