S. Ry. Co. v. Louisville & Nash. R.R. Co., 289 F.2d 934 (6th Cir. 1961)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
S. Ry. Co. v. Louisville & Nash. R.R. Co., 289 F.2d 934 (6th Cir. 1961)
Full caption
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided
May 5, 1961
Disposition
Affirmed
No. 14363.
May 5, 1961.
Albert Reutlinger, Louisville, Ky., Louis Seelbach, Louisville, Ky., William P. Stallsmith, Jr., Seddon G. Boxley, Washington, D. C., Middleton, Seelbach, Wolford, Willis & Cochran, Louisville, Ky., and Harry L. Walker, Washington, D. C., on brief, for appellant.
Robert P. Hobson, and Joseph L. Lenihan, Louisville, Ky., Woodward, Hobson & Fulton, John P. Sandidge, Louisville, Ky., on brief, for appellee.
Before McALLISTER, CECIL and O’SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER.
The above cause coming on to be heard on the record, the briefs of the parties and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised, Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the District Court be and is hereby affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law of Judge Brooks, reported in D.C., 185 F.Supp. 645.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access