Griffin v. United States, 266 F.2d 465 (D.C. Cir. 1959)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Griffin v. United States, 266 F.2d 465 (D.C. Cir. 1959)
Full caption
Frank GRIFFIN, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Decided
May 7, 1959
Disposition
Affirmed
No. 14766.
Argued April 22, 1959.
Decided May 7, 1959.
Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied June 1, 1959.
Mr. Bernard Gordon, Washington, D. C. (appointed by this court), with whom Mr. Robert F. Rolnick, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant,
Mr. Edward C. O’Connell, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee. Mr. Harold D. Rhynedance, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered an appearance for appellee.
Before Mr. Justice Burton, retired,* and Edgerton and Fahy, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On August 5, 1957, a grand jury filed what it described as a “True Ignoramus”, which was signed by its foreman and contained the words: “ * * * We * * * do Ignore 1. Ronald Allston; 2. Frank Griffin.” On the same day the same grand jury returned a narcotics indictment on which the appellant Frank Griffin has been tried and convicted. It is not clear whether the “Ignoramus” or the indictment came first. In either case, the “Ignoramus” does not affect the validity of the indictment. See United States v. Thompson, 251 U.S. 407, 40 S.Ct. 289, 64 L.Ed. 333.
In our opinion appellant was not denied effective assistance of counsel.
Affirmed.
*
Sitting by designation pursuant Sec. 294(a), Title 28 U.S.Code.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access