Hedrick v. Pine Oak Shipping, S.A., 733 F.2d 1335 (9th Cir. 1984)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Hedrick v. Pine Oak Shipping, S.A., 733 F.2d 1335 (9th Cir. 1984)
Full caption
Quentin HEDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PINE OAK SHIPPING, S.A., Defendant-Appellant. Quentin HEDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAIKO SHOJI CO., LTD., Osaka, and Pine Oak Shipping, S.A., Defendants-Appellees. Quentin HEDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ESPADA NAV., S.A., Panama, Pine Oak Shipping, S.A., Daiko Shoji Co., Ltd., Osaka, Defendants-Appellees.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
9th Cir.
Decided
Mar. 27, 1984
Disposition
Rehearing Granted
Nos. 81-3588, 81-3597 and 82-3399.
March 27, 1984.
Raymond J. Conboy, Portland, Or., for appellant.
Paul N. Wonacott, Albert J. Bannon, Portland, Or., for appellees.
ORDER
Before GOODWIN, PREGERSON and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
It is ordered that plaintiffs petition for rehearing is granted, 531 F.Supp. 27, and that the portion of the opinion issued herein on September 13, 1983, designated “part III” be withdrawn and that the verdict for the plaintiff be reinstated. The final sentence of the opinion is amended to read: The district court’s orders are vacated and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access