Solinsky v. McPherson, 45 F.2d 780 (9th Cir. 1930)

45 F.2d 780
US-DOC-21100742
locator
Case details
Citation
45 F.2d 780
Full caption
Frank J. SOLINSKY, Sr., and Frank J. Solinsky, Jr., Appellants, v. Charles McPHERSON and Ewald J. Pfeiffer, as Special Administrators of the Estate of Charles F. Ruggles, Deceased; John H. Rademaker, Charles McPherson and Amador Timber Company (a Corporation), Appellees.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
9th Cir.
Decided
Dec. 6, 1930
p. 780
No. 6114.
Dec. 6, 1930.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 12, 1931.
James F. Peek and Edw. R. Solinsky, both of San Francisco, Cal., and Nutter, Hancock & Rutherford and A. P. Hayne, all of Stockton, Cal., for appellants.
Clyde 'H. Brand and Downey, Brand & Seymour, all of Sacramento, Cal., for appellees.
Before RUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The decree is affirmed on the authority of Solinsky v. McPherson et al. (C. C. A., No. 6113), 45 F.(2d) 778, just decided.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access