Hernandez v. Robertson, 16 F.2d 279 (4th Cir. 1926)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Hernandez v. Robertson, 16 F.2d 279 (4th Cir. 1926)
Full caption
Margaret N. HERNANDEZ, Administratrix of the Estate of Arturo Hernandez-Mejia, Appellant, v. Thomas E. ROBERTSON, Commissioner of Patents, Appellee.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
4th Cir.
Decided
Oct. 30, 1926
October 30, 1926.)
No. 2531.
Appeal from the District Court of the ■United, States for the District of Maryland, :at Baltimore; Morris A. Soper, Judge.
Benjamin Boman, of New York City (Jacob F. Murbaeh, of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellant.
T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before WADDILL, EOSE, and PAB-KEE, Circuit Judges.
PEE CUBIAM. We are unable to agree with the appellant that there was any error in the conclusion announced in the successive decisions of the Primary Examiner of the Patent Office, of the Board of Examiners in Chief, of the Commissioner of Patents, of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (298 F. 1019, 54 App. D. C. 404), and of the District Court for the District of Maryland (16 F.[2d] 276).
Affirmed.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access