Badham v. Alexander, 194 F.2d 535 (6th Cir. 1952)
194 F.2d 535
US-DOC-21091615
locator
Case details
Bluebook Citation
Badham v. Alexander, 194 F.2d 535 (6th Cir. 1952)
Full caption
Percy BADHAM, Appellant, v. Eugene ALEXANDER, Appellee.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided
Feb. 20, 1952
Disposition
Per Curiam Affirmed
No. 11447.
Feb. 20, 1952.
Raymond C. Stephenson and Hottell, Stephenson & Allen, all of Louisville, Ky., for appellant.
Garland R. Hubbard, Louisville, Ky., and James W. Aird, Birmingham, Ala., for appellee.
Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and SIMONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the briefs and record in the above-entitled causes and the oral arguments had therein, it appears that there are no reversible errors committed at the trial in rulings or instructions to the jury that were prejudicial, or m respect to which appropriate objections were preserved for review; therefore,
The judgment below is affirmed.