Belz v. Bd. of Trade, 164 F.2d 824 (7th Cir. 1947)

Case details
Bluebook Citation
Belz v. Bd. of Trade, 164 F.2d 824 (7th Cir. 1947)
Full caption
BELZ v. BOARD OF TRADE OF CITY OF CHICAGO et al.
Country
United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Court
7th Cir.
Decided
Dec. 23, 1947
No. 9439.
Dec. 23, 1947.
Rehearing Denied Jan. 9, 1948.
Abraham W. Brussell, of Chicago, 111., and Harvey Uhlenhopp, of Hampton, Iowa, for plaintiff-appellant.
Weymouth Kirkland, Howard Ellis, William H. Symmes, Andrew C. Hamilton, Bennitt E. Bates, Floyd E. Thompson, Frederick Mayer, Abraham L. Rittenberg, Walter Bachrach, Walter H. Moses and Stanley J. Morris, all of Chicago, 111., for defendants-appellees.
Before EVANS and MINTON, Circuit Tudges, and LINDLEY, District Judge.
MINTON, Circuit Judge.
In this case an amended complaint was dismissed on motion. From judgment of dismissal the plaintiff has appealed.
The allegations of the amended complaint parallel the allegations in Cargill, Incorporated, v. Board of Trade of City of Chicago et al., 7 Cir., 164 F.2d 820, this day decided, although in a more concise form. The averments of the plaintiff’s amended complaint charge a violation of the Sherman Act,1 just as in the Cargill case. On the authority of that case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.
ProvenanceKnow exactly where this document came from.Members see the sourcing behind every authority on DocPost — so you can check the record yourself and cite with confidence.Request access